There was no widespread use, and even when issued in the very limited amounts it was, most soldiers would not use it as it slowed them down to much and it did not offer much protection. Now, Flak Jackets were quite common, but that was for air crews and pilots where individual mobility was not a concern.ДЄt best, you can call Body Armor in WWII a failed experiment.

Or, even Mass Produced when compared to the quantities of uniforms, shoes, belts and other kit that was typically given to soldiers. Out of the 10's of Millions of Soldiers fighting on the Allied side, I would hardly call 15,000 sets of body armor prevelant or common. These jackets were made of nylon fabric and capable of stopping flak and shrapnel, but were not designed to stop bullets. For obvious reasons, there are only a few skills worth having 90 or above points in: Barter (more caps equals more purchasing power donвЂ™t forget about the Roving Trader outfit when considering this score as well), Guns or Energy Weapons, Repair (90 points needed for Jury Rigging perk), and Speech. The military diverted its research efforts to developing flak jackets for aircraft crews. In the early stages of World War II, the United States designed body armor for infantrymen, but most models were too heavy and mobility-restricting to be useful in the field and incompatible with existing required equipment. The remaining stocks were held in War Office depots and were never issued. (2) The Army in Italy had no requirments except for some 300 sets for Royal Engineers personnel on special duties.

If you are trying to refute me, then you need to pick different articles:Д®arly in 1944, as a result of growing indifference on the part of military theatres and army commanders together with the very small demands placed by them for these suits of armour, the initial order for half a million sets was reduced to 300,000 sets, of which some 79,000 only were issued, 65,000 to the RAF and 15,000 to the Army in all theatres, the majority going to the 21st Army Group where the major portion was allocated to the Airborne Divison. The roving trader outfit and hat appear in Fallout 3 as well as in Fallout:New Vegas but the outfit is less common as opposed to the hat. It is complemented by the roving trader hat which also raises your barter skill by 5. Jade Barnes-Mackey Posts: 3418 Joined: Thu 7:29 am The roving trader outfit is a piece of clothing that can be worn to increase your Barter skill by 5. Autumns Uniform, 10, 3, +5 Energy Weapons, +5 Small Guns, 12. There are other examples of WWII combat armour: Tunnel Snake Outfit, 4, 3, +5 Melee Weapons, 8. I really don't know how else can you define 'practical'. It was mass produced, standardised and issued to assault engineers and some other combat troops. These are the known codes for the various weapons that can be found and equipped in fallout 3. It is only recently with Ceramics that they can get an armor that is effective and light enough to be worn by combat troops in the field. The roving trader outfit and hat appear in fallout 3 as well as in fallout: The roving trader outfit is a piece of clothing that can be worn to increase your barter skill by 5. Even the stuff offered in Vietnam was not practical as it was so heavy. So, to clarify what I said earlier, there was no practical body armor in WWII. player.additem item code, number, condition 1-100 player.removeitem item code, number Ammunition. Besides, that stuff looks like something a Raider or Super Mutant would cobble together. Only a few in the Russian Army used this stuff, and most troops took it off after a short period of time.

As stated in the article you linked me to, there was only one version put into production, and it was not practical for the troops to use in most combat scenarios other than urban battles.

Fallout 3 roving trader outfit